Now, remember, MJ called the terror attack in Hebron "murder" and agreed with President Obama's condemnation of the attack. So now he comes on the thread and posts the following statement:
Let's take a look at this statement. First, it's clearly a strawman argument. No Israel supporter called the girl a "terrorist", or Palestinians in general "terrorists" as a rule. Second, Rosenberg calls Israel's supporters on the thread "Israel firsters", as in, loyalty to Israel first, all else second. Remember, Rosenberg calls himself "pro-Israel". It is difficult to understand why someone who is pro-Israel would choose to mock and strawman people who supposedly agree with him, even though there is a difference of degree.
Now, what comments on this thread does MJ Rosenberg choose not to comment on?
No Occupation and land theft, no death of the settlers. Pretty easy, really.
An ahistorical myth that there were 'expulsions' of Jews from Arab countries. There were, however, Israeli false-flag terror operations to sow panic among Egyptian Jews to get them to 'flee' to Israel.
Nope, justifying terror and denying the Jewish Nakba aren't worthy of Mr. Rosenberg's time. Bashing the "Firsters" is far more worthwhile.