We've got a two-for-one day on Sharmine Narwani. She posted this lovely comparison on the UNESCO cartoon thread:
First of all, the two situations are not even remotely similar. The Ha'aretz cartoon was making fun of Netanyahu in an editorial fashion, while the Swedish article was making allegations and printing them as truth. When you say something is true in a newspaper, you open yourself up to libel accusations. That is not applicable for when you editoralize.
But second, and far more contemptible, is Narwani's description of the Swedish article as "disclosing Israeli organ stealing from Palestinians." She of course did not mention that the author of the article admitted he had no evidence of the allegations made in his article and therefore the article was nothing more than baseless Palestinian propaganda. Why does the Huffington Post keep the lying, dishonest fraud named Sharmine Narwani on the payroll and give her free rein to spread her lies in its comments section?
The original link
Update: It has now been removed. How many comments by Narwani have been deleted for being against the terms of service at this point?