Okay, now let's contrast it to a synagogue being vandalized in Israel back in June:
Now let's go to synagogue vandalism in America back in March:
The video wasn't working for me, but maybe it will for you. Here's one more example, also from Chicago:
So you may notice: in only one of these examples does the headline contain an accusation about who might have committed the crime, and in only one of these examples is there a picture of the damage.
Is that a coincidence? Or bias?